Kipipiri Member of Parliament Wanjiku Muhia has raised serious concerns over what she describes as targeted intimidation, persistent surveillance, and the abrupt withdrawal of her security detail, prompting her to personally present herself at the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) offices in Ol Kalou for urgent clarification.
The MP arrived at the Ol Kalou DCI offices accompanied by her legal team and several political allies, in a move that underscored the seriousness of her concerns. According to those present, the visit was intended to demand clear explanations regarding what she termed as “coordinated harassment” allegedly being carried out by individuals claiming to be officers from state security agencies.
Upon arrival, the legislator was received by security officials at the station, where preliminary discussions were held to understand the nature of the complaints and to determine whether formal investigations would be launched into the allegations. The MP is said to have insisted on transparency regarding the circumstances under which her security detail was withdrawn, as well as the identity of individuals allegedly trailing her movements.
Speaking after the engagement at the police station, Kiambu Senator Karungo wa Thangwa, who accompanied her during the visit, confirmed that the matter was raised directly with DCI officers and described the situation as one that required immediate attention from security authorities.
“Today, I accompanied Hon. Wanjiku Muhia, MP for Kipipiri, to the DCI offices in Ol Kalou to seek clarification on the persistent harassment and surveillance she has allegedly been subjected to by individuals claiming to be DCI officers,” Senator Karungo said, adding that the concerns raised pointed to a deeper need for accountability within security operations.
The Senator further noted that the discussions centered on establishing whether the individuals involved were legitimately attached to state security agencies or were impersonators operating outside the law. He emphasized that any form of intimidation targeting elected leaders undermines democratic governance and the rule of law.
The developments come at a time when concerns over political safety and the conduct of security agencies have been increasingly raised by various leaders across the country. The alleged withdrawal of security protection from a sitting Member of Parliament has further fueled debate over the criteria used in assigning and removing personal security details.
Sources privy to the discussions indicated that DCI officers assured the delegation that the matter would be reviewed, with investigations expected to establish the authenticity of the allegations and the identities of those allegedly involved in surveillance activities.
The DCI has, however, not issued an official public statement on the matter, leaving room for speculation as political pressure continues to build around the incident.
Meanwhile, the MP is expected to follow up the matter through formal complaints and parliamentary channels as she seeks to ensure her safety and that of her constituents is not compromised.
The incident adds to a growing wave of political tension and scrutiny surrounding security arrangements for public officials, with calls mounting for clearer communication protocols, accountability mechanisms, and safeguards against abuse of surveillance systems.
Further updates are expected as investigations proceed and security agencies move to clarify the circumstances surrounding the allegations.
