By Erestinah Jane, July 6, 2026
An Eastleigh-based teacher has been denied bond by a Nairobi court after the prosecution argued that his release would endanger two minors he is accused of defiling and jeopardize the integrity of the criminal trial.
In its ruling, the court found that the prosecution had presented compelling reasons to deny the accused bail, citing the need to protect the alleged victims, preserve evidence and ensure the accused remains available to stand trial.
The prosecution argued that the accused posed a significant risk of interfering with witnesses because of his close familial relationship with the two girls, who are his stepdaughters. Prosecutors told the court that his position within the household gave him access and influence that could compromise the children’s testimony or affect the course of justice if he were released.
The court agreed that the potential for witness interference was substantial, noting that the alleged victims are minors whose protection is paramount throughout the judicial process.
The magistrate also cited the accused’s immigration status, finding that he was residing in Kenya illegally and therefore posed a serious flight risk. The court ruled that releasing him on bond could increase the likelihood of him absconding and frustrating the administration of justice.
In declining the bond application, the magistrate further observed that the gravity of the allegations involving two minors weighed heavily against granting the accused lenient bail terms at this stage of the proceedings.
To safeguard the welfare of the children and protect the integrity of their evidence, the court directed that the accused remain in police custody until the minors have given their key testimony, which will be formally recorded by the court. The measure is intended to shield the children from possible intimidation, undue influence or additional trauma during the early stages of the trial.
The case will proceed in the Nairobi court, where the prosecution is expected to present evidence in support of the charges. The accused remains presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.
The ruling underscores the judiciary’s continued emphasis on balancing the constitutional right to bail with the need to protect vulnerable witnesses and uphold the administration of justice, particularly in cases involving alleged sexual offences against children.
